🎹 Musical Pitch Identification by Absolute Pitch Possessors

📋 Study Overview

🎯 Research Question

How precisely can absolute pitch possessors identify musical pitches? Is AP an "all-or-nothing" ability, or does it vary in accuracy among individuals?

Prior to this study, AP was often described as binary — either you have it or you don't. Miyazaki investigated whether AP possessors actually perceive pitch with perfect accuracy or if there's variability in precision.

🔬 Methodology

Participants

• AP group: Musicians with verified absolute pitch (screened via pitch identification test)
• RP group: Musicians with relative pitch only (control group)
• All participants were trained musicians with comparable musical experience

Experimental Design

• Stimuli: Pure tones and piano tones at various tuning levels
• Tuning manipulations: Standard A=440Hz baseline, plus detuned versions (±0.1, ±0.2, ±0.4 semitones)
• Task 1: Identify pitch name (e.g., "C", "F#")
• Task 2: Judge if note is "in tune", "sharp", or "flat"
• Analysis: Measured accuracy, response time, and sensitivity to pitch deviations

📊 Key Findings

1. High Precision, But Not "Perfect"

Main finding: AP possessors could detect pitch deviations as small as 0.2–0.4 semitones (20-40 cents), sharply recognizing in-tune pitches.

• AP musicians showed high sensitivity to tuning deviations
• Performance was better than RP musicians but not 100% accurate
• Small deviations (< 0.2 semitones) sometimes went undetected

2. "Good Enough" Precision

Key concept: AP possessors use a "good enough" template for pitch identification — precise enough for musical tasks but not infinitely accurate.

• AP templates are sharp but have tolerance thresholds
• Within ~20 cents, pitches are categorized to the nearest note name
• Beyond ~40 cents, categorization becomes uncertain

3. Individual Variability

Not all AP possessors performed equally:

• Some showed near-perfect precision (< 10 cents)
• Others had broader tolerance (up to 40 cents)
• Implication: AP is a spectrum, not a binary trait

💡 Main Conclusions

"The AP template seems to be able to resolve pitch at high precision, but absolute pitch is not 'absolute' in the sense of being infinitely precise. It operates at a 'good enough' level for practical musical purposes." — Miyazaki, 1988 (paraphrased)

Key Implications:

• AP is not binary: Exists on a spectrum of precision, from "rough" to "highly accurate"
• Practical sufficiency: Even imperfect AP (±20-40 cents) is functionally useful for music
• Challenge to mythology: Dispelled the notion that AP = "perfect pitch" with flawless accuracy
• Foundation for training research: If "good enough" AP is useful, it may be trainable even if not achieving 100% precision

⚠️ Limitations & Context

Study Limitations

• Small sample size: Limited number of AP possessors tested
• Laboratory stimuli: Pure tones and piano tones may not generalize to all musical contexts
• No longitudinal data: Cannot determine if precision changes over time with practice
• Natural AP only: All participants acquired AP in childhood; trained adult AP not examined

Historical Context (1988 vs 2020s)

🔗 Related Research

• Follow-up work: Miyazaki (1989) - examined memory interference in pitch identification
• Precision studies: Takeuchi & Hulse (1993) - confirmed AP variability across possessors
• Modern context: Van Hedger et al. (2013) - showed AP categories can shift with listening experience
• Adult training: Wong et al. (2025) - adults achieved 90% accuracy, demonstrating "good enough" AP is trainable

📖 Access Full Study

📚 Full Citation